As 2010 draws to a close, it is time to look forward to 2011 and start scheduling our little world tour. We are looking at a number of cities, gravitating around auspicious dates, trying to come up with just the right mix of coverage and subtle interference. (Easier said than done.)
In our sights right now (and in no particular order):
New York, NY
Atlanta, GA
Portland, OR
San Francisco, CA
Kansas City, MO
Toronto, Canada
Charlotte, NC
Dallas, TX
Washington, DC
Paris, France
London, UK (Third time’s a charm)
Sydney, Australia
Minneapolis, MN
Detroit, MI
Chicago, IL
Hong Kong
It is likely that a few of those cities will fall off the map and others will be added in their place, but that is where the darts have landed on the map so far.
Great article from Juan Martinez over at DestinationCRM.com this week about Radian6’s new engagement console product. Here’s a bit of it:
The listening service provider recently announced its new Engagement Console, the company’s second product, and one that promises to allow users to listen to, engage with, and respond to customers in real time. The console is a desktop application built on Adobe AIR — a recursive acronym that stands for Adobe Integrated Runtime — and is designed to streamline social media monitoring. Users, according to the company, will now be able to use a single application to find content and connect with clients and colleagues.
Why is this important? Well… if you’ve already gone through a Red Chair session, you know that I put a premium on a boosting a company’s ability to respond to customer complaints/questions/requests for attention in real time. When you hear talk of “engagement,” we aren’t just talking about pushing content out to the public via social media channels. “Engagement” involves real time customer support as well. Perhaps more so than traditional marketing-based mechanisms. In fact, companies who do well in the Social Space tend to have a significantly higher ratio of customer support to marketing activity through social channels. Think about it. Zappos. Starbucks. Ford. Best Buy.
So let’s put this in perspective now:
You’re upset because your favorite cable channel isn’t working. You go online and post an angry tweet to vent your frustration to friends. A few minutes later, you receive a response from a customer service representative at your cable service provider, asking if he can assist you.
How powerful is that?
How do you think the ability to do this in real time might impact loyalty? Resolve customer service issues before they snowball into major PR problems? Not to mention the opportunity to create a richer context for specific customer interactions and customer profiling inside of your CRM environment? Yeah. Exactly: Brilliant. This is the kind of tool that actually solves a problem. That makes real time engagement by community managers, CSRs, salespeople, marketing professionals, product managers and online reputation management specialists (PR) not only possible but pain-free.
More importantly, moving forward, competing against fast, smart, engaged companies for hard-earned shares of an increasingly connected and social web savvy market, what’s the opportunity cost of NOT operating this way?
Food for thought. Definitely worth a look. To request a demo of the tool, contact Radian6 and they will hook you up with a little virtual tour. Well worth twenty minutes of your time.
First things first. I want to thank my partners and sponsors in Portland for making #RedChairPdx a success – not only the event itself, but the launch of the entire series: Ant Hill Marketing, Webtrends, and 52Ltd. With very little time compared to a lot of other events, and more importantly very little supervision, they were able to pull off the logistics and marketing that ultimately made these two days of training possible. Also HUGE thanks to everyone who registered and attended either (or both) events.
This is a video I made before leaving Portland:
So, to recap:
Thursday March 11 was Red Chair “Executive,” the full-day session that aimed to provide executive level delegates with a framework with which to bake social media into their business. We explored the nature of social communications, the difference between social media and socialized digital communications, the types of SM-build scenarios (centralized vs. decentralized), the phases of integration across the enterprise, what each phase entailed, working across silos, hiring and developing talent, building an IT ecosystem to foster internal knowledge sharing and collaboration, the customer support/community management/PR triumvirate, the legal underpinnings of Social Media usage for companies, how to manage Social Media from within every department while keeping all communications “on brand,” how to properly approach Social Media measurement, and lots. lots more. The session was held at downtown Portland’s Executive MBA center, which was pretty ideal, really. Centrally located, spacious, full A/V capabilities, etc. For this first event, we managed about 15-16 delegates, three of who flew up from California to attend. In terms of numbers, we expect that attendance will grow into during the rest of the year, but at a hard cap of 35 seats per session, hitting almost half that with our very first event – with no momentum yet – more than met expectations for the launch.
Friday March 12 was Red Chair “Studio,” held at the Webtrends headquarters, also in downtown Portland. This event was aimed more towards mid-level to account-level managers, and was essentially a half-day version of “Executive” the day before. Maximum attendance in the Webtrends training room was 36, and we filled 35 seats. So… Just one seat shy of being sold out. Again, not too bad for a launch. In this session, we focused a little more on management and measurement than build and integration. As with “Executive,” brilliant crowd. And a complex mix of specialties to boot: Copywriters, Social Media directors, agency account execs, digital strategists, PR professionals, content managers, creative directors, marketing consultants, etc. We even scored a quick preview of some of Webtrends’ new features and a demo of its pretty clutch Facebook capabilities. (If you haven’t looked into Webtrends’ tool yet, you should.)
“Executive” attendees all received a thumb drive loaded with the presentation. “Studio” attendees will be given access to the Day 2 presentation – soon to be posted to Slideshare. To anyone not in attendance, sorry, the presentation will be password-protected for now. For now, access to the information and the slides is granted to Red Chair attendees only. But don’t fret, now that we have proof of concept with the success of #RedChairPdx, Sessions are sure to come to a city near you very soon.
SOCIAL communications should be integrated into every part of a company, a conference in Exeter was told.
Brand strategist Olivier Blanchard, of US-based Brandbuilder Marketing, described a business model for a three-step process to change the fundamental culture of how firms work.
The result would be a culture where every employee understood how websites like Facebook and twitter could be used to engage with customers.
And they would need a co-ordinated approach to deal with problems and issues across departments including PR, marketing, customer support and community management.
Mr Blanchard highlighted how the approach would have allowed much better crisis management for companies like Eurostar, which came in for criticism when passengers were left stranded in a broken down train in the Channel Tunnel, or Toyota with its global car recall.
Mr Blanchard was one of the keynote speakers at the Like Minds 2010 People to People conference, attended by 350 delegates at Exeter Conference Centre in Northernhay Street, on Friday.
The conference aimed to explore the change in business towards greater levels of personalisation for customers, and the role that being ‘social’ plays in enterprises and charities as the world becomes more connected through social networking and mobile devices.
I love the fact that the comments my readers leave on the BrandBuilder blog are an endless source of topics for me to write about. I am seriously considering devoting one or two posts per week to either giving your brilliant opinions more exposure and/or answering your questions. And in that vein, why not start today, right now?
Company/organizational culture is something I love getting into and am still learning a lot about.
One point of interest that intrigues me – and what you mentioned – is empowering your employees. Giving them not only the tools and structure to succeed, but empowerment and reinforcement from internal leaders – the attitude that not only spreads throughout the company but outside of the office also (as we all know, work/life intermingle so much). I say it’s intriguing because it’s such an integral part in making this culture change and a P2P business a success.
The biggest thing that companies will be asking though when reading this post, let alone your upcoming book, is ‘how the hell do we accomplish this?’ It sounds/is great, as how businesses function – internally and externally – is evolving, quick. But there’s definitely got to be a huge buy-in and sense of what a P2P culture looks and feels like.
The best way I know how to answer that question: Don’t sell “change”. Ever. Instead, sell results. That’s what execs really want anyway.
As always, the old adage about leading horses to water stands firm. First, you have to realize that “companies” aren’t what you’re working with. What you’re really dealing with are people. In other words, companies don’t make decisions. People make decisions. Particularly, leaders in this instance. If the leadership within a company refuses to commit to the type of change that will yield greater success for their business in the future (and starting immediately), I can’t help them. Heck, even Tony Robbins, Zig Ziglar and Dr. Phil can’t help them.
What’s important here isn’t to sell change. Nobody likes change. It’s scary, it’s risky, it’s unpredictable. You’ll never get very far selling fear, risk and uncertainty. Especially to that crowd. So you have to approach change from a very different angle: From the end result. From what they actually want to accomplish.
First things first: Uncovering the true objectives of an organization’s leadership team
Before you do anything, you want to uncover the organization’s specific objectives and then create a picture of what the company (as an organization) should look like once the objectives are met. This takes more work than it sounds. You would be amazed how many senior executives have no clear idea where they really want their organization to be in 5 years. Occasionally, you will run into a CEO eager to throw around a number that sounds good to Wall Street but isn’t based in reality, like… “We’re at $8.3B in revenue this year. I want to be at $12B by 2012.” Because $12B in 2012 is catchy, easy to rally behind, and the investors will love it. And while the number may be attainable, the process by which it was chosen is more about swagger than reality.
Worse yet, in cases where targets were set based on random factors, when you ask some CEOs how they intend to get there, you may get a vague answer along the lines of “we’ll sell more stuff” or “we’ll expand into new markets” or some other generalization. No specifics. No action plan. Nothing of substance. This lack of specificity and clarity can be both dangerous to morale and counterproductive when it comes to actually delivering on the promise of that target.
The faster everyone is off the cowboy plan, the faster you can get back to reality: Goals have to be specific. Real strategy sessions aren’t about impressing anyone. They’re about getting down to business, which starts with setting aside theory, and creating workable action plans.
If a CEO wants to hit $12B by 2012, fine. Work your way backwards from that. What’s it going to take? Probably some key acquisitions, first and foremost. Is that even possible? Is the company in a position to pull it off without risking too much exposure? Does it even make sense to try and grow that quickly? What else needs to happen: Look for strategic partnerships? Expand distribution? Capture more market share? All of the above? Okay, you have 24 months. Show me on a 24-month schedule/timeline how you currently plan to accomplish that.
And guess what: Most of the time, that plan doesn’t actually exist. It got as far as being turned into a few bullet points on a slide in someone’s powerpoint presentation six months ago, so you have to start from scratch and see what’s realistic and what isn’t. You have to work out all of the contingencies. It isn’t rocket science, but it takes work. And it takes organization. And it takes commitment.
Before you can even get to how a company is going to address empowering their employees through a real cultural change, before a company is ready to actually pull this off across all of its departments as a matter of policy, it has to know exactly where it wants to go and what it will take to get there. Not only that, but the leadership team has to both understand and accept that such empowerment is one of the ways they will get there.
Second: Mapping out the start, the “finish” and everything in between
Growth, change and success are hard. You have to map it all out, starting with where you are, where you want to go, and all the points in between if you want to have a shot at actually pulling it off. So change management, which is really what we’re talking about here, starts with that process. And that process starts with painting a crystal clear picture of what you want the organization to look like at the end of the process. (More like a milestone than a finish line, but that’s a topic for another day.)
Now, in order to hit the numbers the CEO threw at you, you really have to be able to create a detailed snapshot of the company in this specific future. What it looks like. Where it operates. How it operates. How it is structured. How it executes on its activities. You have to not only create a snapshot of what it looks like on the outside, but also on the inside, layer by layer, like a CAT scan.
Understanding changes in cultural dynamics and the evolution of technology, you can then zoom in from the portrait/snapshot of the company to its structure, then to its processes, then to the skills of its members. From there, you can reverse-engineer the adaptive phases that the company needs to go through. To be realistic, the example I gave you (24 months) may be too short when it comes to true cultural change for a company that didn’t have much of a culture to begin with. It takes time for organizations, especially large ones, to develop the kind of social and emotional sophistication to do this well. It takes maturity, and maturity takes time. It isn’t something you can accelerate or optimize with a tool.
In this example then, the company’s strategy would focus a lot more on acquisitions and partnerships than growth through cultural change. But it isn’t to say that a cultural evolution couldn’t begin to happen during that time period. In order for the strategic changes to be a success, a lot of internal work needs to ensure that these changes won’t become a liability when it comes to simple things like customer service, customer experiences, internal communications between divisions, brand erosion, etc. You can’t divorce culture from infrastructure. Companies that don’t understand that always fail at creating efficient (and sustainable) versions of either. This is as true of Social Media integration as any shift in operational management.
Basic Lessons to keep in mind:
The most important thing when trying to get buy-in is to help clarify exactly where the company wants to be in 5, 10, 20 years. Not pie-in-the-sky generalizations, but specifics. Once you have that, you can paint a clear picture of what the future of the company NEEDS to look like. Now you’ve flipped change on its head. Instead of selling uncertainty, you’re selling clarity.
Change for the sake of improvement always trumps change for the sake of change. The first has value. The latter offers none.
Knowing where you’re going is 90% of getting there. Most company execs are so focused on meeting numbers this month and this quarter that they just aren’t able to look beyond the here and now long enough to actually drive their businesses anywhere. They’re too busy reacting to the next pothole or turn ahead. By helping them see 1 year into the future, then 2, then 5, than 10, you can help them impact their numbers now, this quarter, this half, this fiscal year, by giving their performance context in relation to where they want to actually take their business.
Everything has to start with that. Before you can get to cultural change management, you have to make sure the leadership team knows where it wants to go and what it needs to do to get there.
We’ll be covering some of this in greater detail – as it relates to Social Media integration in PR, Advertising, Marketing, Customer Service, HR, legal and business development in Portland next month.
Sign up now if you haven’t already.
See you in Pdx!
“One point you made in the video (above) I’d like to highlight. You mentioned Frank at Comcast who has taken his knowledge of customer service and social media and meshed them together. This is key. EVERY professional needs to understand social media in their own context so they can *interpret* it into their profession and job. This by the way should be part of a social media director’s job – educating.
I must take you to task on one point however. I think you fall into a common trap in your definition of “first type” using “recognized thought leader” as a criteria to be considered “first tier.” I see this generalization of “celebrity” in social media equating to “first tier” as an equally disturbing problem in the social media profession.
I have the privilege of working with many professionals who equal or often out-think those “thought leaders” every day, who have been evolving with the web culture longer, who deeply understand and interpret social media in a broader business context, and who are plodding away profoundly changing the way businesses run, understand and interact. They are behind the scenes, quietly affecting change. They engage with the tools to understand consumer trends and cultural shifts, then interpret them for the business.
I applaud your list of competencies (marketing focused as they are), as they get at the heart of how to identify these “invisible giants.”
In my world view, a Social Media Director needs to be able to broadly address your point about cross-functional impacts – marketing is only one application of social media.”
Brilliant. I love it.
So, two points:
1. Social Media “thought leaders” and rock stars have their place, sure… and I have to tread lightly since I might have a toe or two planted on that side of the fence, but beware the “blogger-turned-Social Media genius” syndrome. It’s one thing to evangelize Social Media, even if you do it extremely well, but another COMPLETELY to work within an organization at the Director or VP level actually INTEGRATING and OPERATIONALIZING Social Media (or anything, for that matter).
Before you can be a Social Media Director within a Marketing department, you first have to be a Marketing Director. Before you can be a Social Media Director in a PR department, you first have to be a PR Director. Same with HR, Business Development, IT, etc. See where I am going with this? An individual with “extensive” Social Media experience (please forgive my liberal use of the term “extensive”) cannot function at the Director level without prior experience at that level outside of “Social Media.”
Your knowledge of the function of a department (or group of departments) takes precedence over your knowledge of Social Media.
Why? Because the function(s) of one or more department don’t change when you add a social component to the mix. How they go about doing their work, sure, Social changes the strategies and tactics, but not the function. Look at it this way: Social ENHANCES Marketing, Customer Service, HR, IT, Sales and PR the same way that web and mobile do. If you don’t understand how a Marketing or PR or Sales department works – from the perspective of a Marketing/PR/Sales Director or VP – you aren’t ready to be a Director in that department, no matter how comfortable you think you are with FaceBook, Twitter, Radian6 and ScoutLabs. This is a FACT. You need a rich blend of both worlds – “Traditional” and “New/Social” – if you are to be successful in this space at the Senior level.
Hiring a Social Media “rock star” who understands how to use Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Friendfeed, Google Buzz and a dozen other tools and has a really good blog about it but has ZERO experience working as a Director in the type of environment you expect them to operate in is a disaster waiting to happen: Nothing will ever get done. Politics will turn every project into a time-suck. Nothing will click. Your Social Media experiment will be all pain, no gain, with your rock star complaining about how you need to “chaaaaange” and “let go of your oooooold ways,” and how he “just can’t function in that kind of environment.”
Apparent knowledge of Social Media (the ability to talk at length about Social Media) doesn’t trump operational expertise (the ability to actually turn knowledge into action – and successful action at that).
First, as Linda brought up in her comment, there is a HUGE difference between Social Media Evangelists and Trained executives with a practical understanding of Social Media integration and management.
Second, there is also a huge difference between Social Media practitioners who can operate at the junior level, and Social Media practitioners who can operate at the senior/executive level. Huge. Massive. Humongous. (Category 1 vs. Category 2 in my previous post.)
How do you tell them all apart? Simple:
1) Establish that they do in fact know what they are talking about in SM (Google them, read their blog, see where they are in SM and what they do there, how they behave, what they talk about, if their content is their own or a constant rehash of someone else’s work, etc. Don’t forget to see HOW LONG they have been in the space. A self-professed “Guru” with all but three months of activity on Twitter, no blog to speak of and a network of twenty people on LinkedIn, for example probably shouldn’t move on to the next step in your selection.
2) Dive deeper into their content. Are they really a master of their trade, or are they little more than a cultural evangelist inspired by other people’s blogs? (Is their advice practical or theoretical? … assuming they provide advice at all.) Do they actually solve problems, or muse about what could be? Are they truly THINKING about Social Media from a strategic or tactical standpoint, or just yapping about the latest tool they read about on Mashable?
3) You’re going to laugh, but yeah, look at their CV/Resume. (I know, it’s old school, but bear with me.) Where have they worked? What have they done? What level of management have they reached? Just because someone understands Social Media through and through (and shows tremendous promise for your organization) doesn’t mean they are experienced enough to be given a Director level position. Could they be mentored and fast-tracked into the position after some time? Sure! Make them a Social Media advisor to the CMO if that works. An in-house consultant, even. But BE CAREFUL how quickly you promote or hire someone for a key leadership position with a) P&L and staff responsibilities, and b) a need for a tremendous amount of change management savvy (which comes with a need for serious political Kung Fu skills). Even someone with lots of community management experience isn’t necessarily ready for a Director-level role.
Among the things you should look for in their CV/Resume, apart from their Social Media savvy: Director-Level experience or above, change management experience at the corporate level, a capacity for adaptation, solid leadership experience, crisis management experience.
I have said it before and I will say it again: Social Media is an integration piece. It needs to be embedded in the organization. If it isn’t, it won’t do a damn bit of good to anybody. Can you outsource some elements of it? Yes. All of it? No. You don’t outsource your email, do you? Everyone still has a phone on their desks too, right? Okay. This is no different. Agencies can handle some of this for you, but the kernel has to be managed within, and someone with operational savvy has to help you build a framework to do just that.
Consult with with Social Media rock star bloggers if you must (and there are some great ones out there who can help you out,) but when it comes to HIRING a Social Media Director (who will take you from “talking” to “doing”, look for folks with REAL EXPERIENCE in the corporate world, who have figured out how to bring Social Media into their field(s) of expertise. Those are the folks who will actually make Social media work for your organization. The folks who will put it into practice and into action. Those are your “invisible giants.” (Though be ready: They won’t stay invisible long.)
2. If you still think that Social Media is a Marketing function, start over from the beginning. You still don’t understand how this space fits into your business or the way your customers expect it to fit into their lives… and we need to get you back on track fast.
* * *
Incidentally (and please forgive the self-promotion since I am behind these events), if you are still curious about how to plug social media into your organization or business, Red Chair training events are launching in the US this year, starting with Portland, OR. These events are usually broken down into two sessions:
Day 1 – “Red Chair: Executive” is a one-day course specifically designed to teach CMOs, CEOs, executives, VPs, Director level professionals and senior-level consultants how to properly build, integrate, manage and measure Social media programs across their organization.
Day 2 – “Red Chair: Studio” is a half day course specifically designed to teach Department Managers, account-level managers and junior consultants how to build, manage and grow specific social media programs based on their specific departmental needs.
Unlike the types of presentations you usually sit through at conferences or via webinar, Red Chair training is designed to teach you how to actually plan for and manage your Social Media infrastructure. This is the real thing. No evangelizing, no rehashed theory, no Facebook 101 junk… Real training for real world applications, from the perspective of running a business.
Stop Number one is in Portland on March 11 and 12. If you or someone you know in the Portland/Seattle area is interested in actually having someone show you how to do this properly, consider registering. (If you want to fly in from another part of the country, that’s cool too.) Go register now.
Lots of work has gone into this (and still is), so we’re all pretty excited to finally unveil our site. From the user’s perspective, it will be about as simple as it gets: Look for info, find the info, use the info. No need for fireworks or showy flash.
As we start to build content for the blog, news archive and site itself, users and Red Chair event attendees will be able to grow with the site, but for now, we’re planning on keeping things simple, easy, and functional.
Looking forward to everyone’s feedback. We’ll be sending big thanks to the design team in a couple of days. (Can’t wait!)
The current state of conversations in regards to Social Media and Business
Okay, look. I don’t mean to step on anyone’s toes here, but how many times do business managers hungry for real Social Media know-how have to suffer through another “Social Media is what’s next” presentation before someone actually decides to help them answer real questions and solve real problems?
Yes. We get it already. Social Media is the future of now. It’s the answer to all of your old-school marketing problems. The holy grail of business growth. It’s all about people and conversations and relationships, don’t you know. Okay, fine. So now let’s get on with it: How the hell does a company actually put Social Media into play?
Before I go on, if your answer includes any of the following words, I may have to reach across the internets and smack you upside the head: FaceBook, Twitter, Blog, YouTube. (No, no, no and no.) Let’s take a giant step backwards here, because if your idea of developing a Social Media program for a company of any size essentially consists of creating a series of embassies on the most popular social platforms on the web, you haven’t just put the cart ahead of the horse, you’ve pretty much squashed it like a bug.
Let me be as clear as I can be about this: Having a Facebook fan page, a twitter account, a YouTube channel and a blog aren’t forward thinking. This is the default position now. The absolute minimum. If you aren’t already here, you’ve already shown that your business is grossly out of touch with the rest of the world (and dare I say, your market?). And by default, so are you. You’ve fallen behind. And if your company does proudly display those little social badges, if indeed you do have a presence on Twitter, FaceBook, YouTube and the blogosphere, congratulations: You’re doing the same thing everyone else is, which is to say that you are merely here.
Having a Social Media presence nowadays is merely the equivalent of what being listed in the yellow pages meant ten years ago. It simply isn’t enough to be there. And if you believe it is, you have seriously underestimated the situation.
Don’t get me wrong: The vast majority of business managers and C-suite executives still need to be shown that Social Media isn’t just a silly fad. That it is a legitimate business discipline worthy of not only investment but special attention. And perhaps most importantly, that by not understanding that Social Media fits in their business toolkit, they will begin to lose increasingly large chunks of market share (among other things) to their smarter, more strategically-minded competitors as early as H1 of 2010. These are realities and facts that still need to be conveyed to decision-makers in the business world. No question.
But the message has already reached a good number of them. So now what? You’ve convinced them to focus on Social Media, but aside from “get on facebook, twitter, youtube and blogs and start engaging,” you haven’t really given them a whole lot to go on. For the benefit of those folks, why don’t we switch gears and meet them where they want us to: In the real and complex world of “how the hell do we actually build this in our own organization?”
Let’s inject a little structure and order into the Social Media for business discussion:
First, let’s get a couple of things straight about the nature of Social Media when it comes to operations (yes, actually “doing” instead of just talking about how great it is):
1. The idea that Social Media professionals are one-size-fits-all needs to disappear. Understand that despite what you may have been told, Social Media practitioners aren’t all community managers and engagement aficionados. Some are data analysts and others are business strategists, while some specialize in operational management, market research, marketing communications or any number of commonly found business functions. Yes, that’s right: Social Media practitioners probably aren’t social media experts at all. They’re simply professionals who use social media because they understand its value to their job and organization.
The topic of incorporating social media know-how into existing organizational roles (rather than creating new layers of superfluous social media expertise to piggy-back on existing functions) is one that we will revisit often in the coming months.
So the lesson here is that if your organization seems to a) suffer from a knowledge gap when it comes to Social Media, and b) filling that gap with dozens, if not hundreds of new employees seems daunting, don’t fret: Focus on training and development first and foremost. Don’t worry about trying to hire a bunch of unemployed marketeers with “social media” roles strategically added to their resumes in the last 18 months. That will get you nowhere fast. There’s a better way. (More on that in a minute.)
2. Effective, sustainable, scalable social media programs all have a basic underlying framework (hinted at by the X-Box Live avatars assembled in the image above.) At its simplest, you are looking at four major building blocks and operational elements:
Social Media program development (a strategy-heavy function)
Social Media program integration (almost exclusively an ops piece, especially in the enterprise space)
Social Media program management (the broadest of the three, basically dealing with the execution of the program itself. Some examples of management functions are listed in the image above.)
Social Media program measurement (an analytical function which requires little explanation given the amount of time I have already devoted to explaining FRY, ROI, and non-financial impact).
When you start actually building the structure of a Social Media program, especially for a large/enterprise space organization, things get complex fast. But let’s learn how to walk before we start running marathons, okay? Not everyone here is ready to graduate from “isn’t social media just another marketing channel?” so we’ll move slowly out of respect for them.
First things first: Recognizing that in order to build a proper Social Media program within an organization, you must first start with the understanding that these four core elements need to be present in order for things to work properly. Just having a Social Media director and an engagement team won’t cut it. All you’re likely to end up with is a decent management piece with perhaps some light strategy, completely accidental integration thanks to an IT guy or two, and some made-up measurement based on whatever metrics seem to be popular on the Twitternets that week.
Sorry but that’s not good enough.
If a half-assed DIY-style Social Media program appeals to you, your boss and your customers, by all means, have fun with that. But if you are the type of manager or business leader with even an ounce of vision, professionalism (and sense of self-preservation), you already know that winging it isn’t really going to produce the results you are expected to deliver.
The alternative is to try and do it right: Actually building an effective and sustainable social media program within your organization by integrating social media (embedding it, even) into every department and business function – and doing so with purpose.
That’s all fine and good, but what if you need help? (No worries. I have you covered.):
So where can you turn for help? Unfortunately, that can sometimes be hard to tell. On the one hand, you have the thousands of self-appointed Social Media “gurus” selling everything from rehashed presentation decks and derivative white papers to stale webinars about essentially nothing. (Thanks for charging me $650 for information I could have gotten for free just by reading Mashable for twenty minutes a week. Great.) And don’t even get me started on the hacks who shamelessly steal my work and that of others and try to pass it off as their own. (We know who you are. You aren’t fooling anybody.)
So how do you tell the good ones from the frauds? Experience. Luck. Savvy. In fairness, you could actually get lucky and find one who knows how to do this (with enough money and enough time, who knows,) but the odds aren’t in your favor.
You could also keep hoping that the operational knowledge you seek will emerge from the various social media conferences you keep attending. And to some extent, yes, over time, you will pick up enough nuggets to become dangerous. No question. But it could take a while. Industry conferences have their value, but real operational training isn’t usually on the menu.
And of course, you could partner with a reputable consulting firm whose team of of experts will guide you every step of the way, from choosing the right measurement tools to the way you should develop engagement strategies. If you ‘re ready for that, have found a partner you know you can work with and have the budget for it, it’s go time. But not everyone is ready or able to go that route quite yet.
A fourth option is to let those of us who know how to do this teach you how without asking you to break the bank or further burden your schedule. We aren’t talking about “boot camps” here. (The idea isn’t to throw as much information at you as we can in a few hours and see how much of it you can retain.) By the same token, you don’t want a training programs to be so light that you walk away from it with solid theoretical knowledge but no practical knowledge. There isn’t a whole lot of value to training if you can’t actually put that training to good use. And to be honest, there’s only so much ground you can cover even with a full day of training. So a group of us put our heads together over the last few months and decided to create something to fill that gap for you and do it right. (Which is to say, do it exceptionally well.) The objective is then to blend training and consulting in a way that makes sense for everyone.
Enter the Red Chair Group:
To that end, one of the first things the Red Chair Group will be launching is a series of executive training programs specifically designed to teach C-suite execs, business managers and agency directors how to develop, integrate, manage and measure social media programs (what we have been talking about in this post). These trainings will be carefully structured day-long events held in major cities around the world. We are currently in talks with partners in 20 key cities to bring Red Chair events to your doorstep.
(I forgot to mention: The whole idea is to bring these training events to you so you don’t have to come to us. This is yet another way we thought we could keep your budget as intact as possible.)
I look forward to sharing more about how the Red Chair Group’s plans to help companies of all sizes operationalize social media. I am usually a pretty quiet guy (no, really), but I have to admit that I am having a hard time containing my excitement about this: To know that businesses are finally going to be able to cut through the social media noise and BS in part thanks to Red Chair makes me feel pretty good.
(If you want us to add your city to the list, let me know. We’ll chat.) 2010 is definitely going to be a fun year.